freenode
Languages & Toolchains

Haskell Foundation admits due diligence failure on Anduril board seat

A board member said directors did not know of the appointee's public posts attacking trans people and gay marriage before the vote.

The Haskell Foundation board has acknowledged a failure of due diligence after seating a representative of defense contractor Anduril Industries whose public social media history includes calls for transgender people to "burn in hell" and opposition to gay marriage.

LaurentRDC, writing as a board member, said the board was not aware of that history when it voted and called the lapse a failure of its vetting process. The statement stressed that it was not an official board position and that everyone remains welcome in the Haskell community. LaurentRDC said next steps would be coordinated with the full board.

The appointment drew sharp criticism on the Haskell Discourse. Community members argued that the posts clash with the Foundation's own guidelines for respectful communication, which require welcoming people of all backgrounds and identities and applying those standards to public interactions including social media. Several noted that the Haskell community includes people who have transitioned and that leadership choices affect who feels included.

Broader unease focused on Anduril itself. Critics grouped the company with other right-leaning defense and surveillance firms and questioned whether a foundation promoting an open-source language should draw board members from firms whose business is military systems. One participant proposed that board service should be limited to promotion of Haskell for non-violent purposes; another suggested debating a civil clause rather than blanket industry bans, noting that prior directors had also worked in defense.

Emily Pillmore, who has previously discussed defense-industry fundraising, said the specific posts were less important than the low-effort pattern and the apparent thin community involvement of the appointee, Travis. She questioned whether the Foundation had simply failed to look or had few other defense-linked candidates. Others framed the episode as a high-trust community discovering that basic public-record checks had not been done.

The Foundation is a US-registered body whose board is expected to uphold the respectful-communication standards associated with Simon Peyton Jones's "kindness doctrine." How the board resolves the appointment, and whether it revises its candidate review process, will signal how seriously those standards bind its own leadership.